↓ Skip to main content

Heat shock factor 1 induces cancer stem cell phenotype in breast cancer cell lines

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Heat shock factor 1 induces cancer stem cell phenotype in breast cancer cell lines
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10549-015-3521-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bin Wang, Chung-Wei Lee, Abigail Witt, Ankita Thakkar, Tan A. Ince

Abstract

Heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) has long been recognized as the master transcription factor that regulates heat shock proteins (HSPs).  More recently HSF1 has been associated with a broader role in regulating response to a variety of cellular stresses beyond heat-shock.  We previously found that high HSF1 expression is associated with poor outcome in lung, breast and colon cancers. Importantly, however, the HSF1 signature correlated with poor outcome in these studies was not related to the heat shock response, which suggested that tumor outcome associated with high HSF expression may be due to processes other than stress response. Hence, we explored the question whether high HSF1 expression might be associated with the cancer stem cell (CSC) phenotype. To do so, we examined the association of HSF1 with CSC phenotype by FACS and immunofluorescence. In addition, we evaluated the effects of HSF1 over-expression and knock-down on sphere formation and CSC marker expression in breast cancer cell lines. Here, we report results demonstrating that high HSF1 not only correlates with CSC marker expression, but inducible HSF1 over-expression augments and HSF1 knock-down inhibits CSC phenotype. Furthermore, HSF1 expression confers resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs and increases CSC frequency. In conclusion, our study indicates that one of the potential HSP-independent HSF1 driven mechanisms that may contribute to poor outcome in human tumors involves regulation of the CSC phenotype. Hence, therapeutic inhibition of HSF1 may be one route to target CSCs in human tumors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2015.
All research outputs
#18,422,065
of 22,821,814 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#3,716
of 4,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,084
of 263,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#47
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,821,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.