↓ Skip to main content

Outcome of partially irradiated recurrent nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenoma by gamma knife radiosurgery

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Outcome of partially irradiated recurrent nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenoma by gamma knife radiosurgery
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11060-018-2925-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chiung-Chyi Shen, Weir-Chiang You, Ming-Hsi Sun, Shinh-Dung Lee, Hsi-Kai Tsou, Yen-Ju Chen, Meei-Ling Sheu, Jason Sheehan, Hung-Chuan Pan

Abstract

Gamma knife treatment outcome of large pituitary tumors which are only partially irradiated secondary to immediate proximity to critical structures such as the optic apparatus have not been rigorously studied. From July 2003 to December 2013, there were 41 cases of recurrent or residual nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenoma partially treated with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) because the adenoma obscured part of the optic apparatus on planning SRS MR imaging. The follow up period after GKRS was 92.3 ± 5.6 months. The percentage of tumor coverage with the full dose was 88.5 ± 0.7%. Five of 43 (11.6%) patients experienced a transient visional decrease and one patient experienced a permanent visual field defect. During the follow up, two patients underwent transphenoidal surgery and one patient had a craniotomy due to tumor progression. Seven patients (16.2%) developed cortisol and thyroxine deficiencies. In multiple variant analyses, transient visual decline was correlated to the tumor volume (> 3.5 cc), percentage of tumor coverage (< 90%), the distance from the optic apparatus to the pituitary stalk (> 15 mm) and percentage of tumor above the orbital apex (65%). In the limited case of this cohort, we found that partially treated pituitary nonfunctioning macroadenoma yielded a high tumor control rate. However, visual decline as a result of tumor progression or radiation effect can occur in a minority of patients. The radiosurgical technique warrants further study to better define the long-term risk to benefit profile for its use in complex pituitary macroadenoma obscuring part of the optic apparatus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Unknown 8 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2018.
All research outputs
#18,639,173
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#2,266
of 2,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,741
of 328,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#40
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,992 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.