↓ Skip to main content

Temperature-dependent immune response of olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) infected with viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV)

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Genomics, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Temperature-dependent immune response of olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) infected with viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV)
Published in
Genes & Genomics, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13258-017-0638-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jee Youn Hwang, Kesavan Markkandan, Kyudong Han, Mun Gyeong Kwon, Jung Soo Seo, Seung-il Yoo, Seong Don Hwang, Bo Young Ji, Maeng-Hyun Son, Jun-hyung Park

Abstract

Olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) is one of the most economically important aquaculture fish. However, its production is often affected by various diseases, especially viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV) that cause serious economic losses. In this study, we sequenced the whole transcriptome of the P. olivaceus using Illumina RNA-sEq. De novo assembly of control and virus-infected cDNA libraries of head kidney at 13 and 20 °C was accomplished with 2,007,532,438 raw reads, resulting in 244,578 unigenes with an average length of 533 bp and found 65,535 candidate coding unigenes with homology to other species by BLAST analysis. DEG analysis among control and virus-infected head kidney samples of 13 and 20 °C revealed that 1290 up-regulated and 162 down-regulated genes (p ≤ 0.01), linked to metabolism, virulence factors, adhesion and immune-response. We constructed an expressed gene catalog for the P. olivaceus to serve as a resource for marine environmental genomic and immuno-genetic/genomic studies focused on uncovering the molecular mechanisms underlying the responses of P. olivaceus to VHSV under different temperature.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 29%
Researcher 3 21%
Other 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 43%
Unspecified 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Genomics
#223
of 661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#320,491
of 444,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Genomics
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 661 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.