You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dissection of progenitor compartments resolves developmental trajectories in B-lymphopoiesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Experimental Medicine, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1084/jem.20171384 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christina T. Jensen, Josefine Åhsberg, Mikael N.E. Sommarin, Tobias Strid, Rajesh Somasundaram, Kazuki Okuyama, Jonas Ungerbäck, Jussi Kupari, Matti S. Airaksinen, Stefan Lang, David Bryder, Shamit Soneji, Göran Karlsson, Mikael Sigvardsson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 23% |
| France | 3 | 12% |
| Sweden | 2 | 8% |
| Israel | 2 | 8% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 58% |
| Scientists | 9 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 31% |
| Researcher | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 26% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,453,744
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Experimental Medicine
#1,640
of 11,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,431
of 344,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Experimental Medicine
#24
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.