↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive performance-altering effects of electronic medical records: an application of the human factors paradigm for patient safety

Overview of attention for article published in Cognition, Technology & Work, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 188)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Cognitive performance-altering effects of electronic medical records: an application of the human factors paradigm for patient safety
Published in
Cognition, Technology & Work, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10111-010-0141-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard J. Holden

Abstract

According to the human factors paradigm for patient safety, health care work systems and innovations such as electronic medical records do not have direct effects on patient safety. Instead, their effects are contingent on how the clinical work system, whether computerized or not, shapes health care providers' performance of cognitive work processes. An application of the human factors paradigm to interview data from two hospitals in the Midwest United States yielded numerous examples of the performance-altering effects of electronic medical records, electronic clinical documentation, and computerized provider order entry. Findings describe both improvements and decrements in the ease and quality of cognitive performance, both for interviewed clinicians and for their colleagues and patients. Changes in cognitive performance appear to have desirable and undesirable implications for patient safety as well as for quality of care and other important outcomes. Cognitive performance can also be traced to interactions between work system elements, including new technology, allowing for the discovery of problems with "fit" to be addressed through design interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 187 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 16%
Student > Master 30 15%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 39 20%
Unknown 39 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 35 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 16%
Engineering 22 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Psychology 13 7%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 45 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2017.
All research outputs
#3,508,104
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Cognition, Technology & Work
#13
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,307
of 94,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognition, Technology & Work
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.