↓ Skip to main content

An Emergency Decision Making Method Based on Prospect Theory for Different Emergency Situations

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
An Emergency Decision Making Method Based on Prospect Theory for Different Emergency Situations
Published in
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13753-018-0173-x
Authors

Zi-Xin Zhang, Liang Wang, Ying-Ming Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Researcher 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 27 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 28 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2019.
All research outputs
#13,264,943
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
#153
of 246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,903
of 328,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.