↓ Skip to main content

The influence of birth order and number of siblings on adolescent body composition: evidence from a Brazilian birth cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Nutrition, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The influence of birth order and number of siblings on adolescent body composition: evidence from a Brazilian birth cohort study
Published in
British Journal of Nutrition, June 2015
DOI 10.1017/s0007114515001488
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernanda de Oliveira Meller, M C F Assunção, A A Schäfer, C L de Mola, A J D Barros, D L Dahly, F C Barros

Abstract

The aim of this study was to estimate the association between birth order and number of siblings with body composition in adolescents. Data are from a birth cohort study conducted in Pelotas, Brazil. At the age of 18 years, 4563 adolescents were located, of whom 4106 were interviewed (follow-up rate 81·3 %). Of these, 3974 had complete data and were thus included in our analysis. The variables used in the analysis were measured during the perinatal period, or at 11, 15 and/or 18 years of age. Body composition at 18 years was collected by air displacement plethysmography (BOD POD®). Crude and adjusted analyses of the association between birth order and number of siblings with body composition were performed using linear regression. All analyses were stratified by the adolescent sex. The means of BMI, fat mass index and fat-free mass index among adolescents were 23·4 (sd 4·5) kg/m2, 6·1 (sd 3·9) kg/m2 and 17·3 (sd 2·5) kg/m2, respectively. In adjusted models, the total siblings remained inversely associated with fat mass index (β = - 0·37 z-scores, 95 % CI - 0·52, - 0·23) and BMI in boys (β = - 0·39 z-scores, 95 % CI - 0·55, - 0·22). Fat-free mass index was related to the total siblings in girls (β = 0·06 z-scores, 95 % CI - 0·04, 0·17). This research has found that number of total siblings, and not birth order, is related to the fat mass index, fat-free mass index and BMI in adolescents. It suggests the need for early prevention of obesity or fat mass accumulation in only children.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Master 8 14%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 26%
Social Sciences 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Psychology 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 21 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Nutrition
#3,062
of 6,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,302
of 278,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Nutrition
#48
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.