| Title |
Accounting for multiple effects and the problem of small sample sizes in osteology: a case study focussing on entheseal changes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12520-015-0256-1 |
| Authors |
C. Y. Henderson, E. Nikita |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Croatia | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 14 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 17% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,399,617
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#390
of 810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,835
of 263,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.