↓ Skip to main content

Possible roles of basophils in chronic itch

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Dermatology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Possible roles of basophils in chronic itch
Published in
Experimental Dermatology, August 2018
DOI 10.1111/exd.13705
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takashi Hashimoto, Jordan D. Rosen, Kristen M. Sanders, Gil Yosipovitch

Abstract

Basophils are blood granulocytes and normally constitute less than 1% of blood peripheral leukocytes. Basophils share some morphological and functional similarities with mast cells, and basophils were once regarded as redundant and negligible circulating mast cells. However, recent studies reveal the indispensable roles of basophils in various diseases, including allergic and pruritic diseases. Basophils may be involved in itch through the mediation of a Th2 immune response, interaction with other cells in the skin, and secretion of a wide variety of itch-related mediators, e.g., histamine, cytokines and chemokines (IL-4, IL-13, IL-31, and TSLP), proteases (cathepsin S), prostaglandins (PGE2 and PGD2), substance P, and platelet-activating factor. Not only pruritic skin diseases (e.g., atopic dermatitis, irritant contact dermatitis, chronic urticaria, prurigo, papulo-erythroderma of Ofuji, eosinophilic pustular folliculitis, scabies, tick bites, and bullous pemphigoid) but also pruritic systemic diseases (e.g., primary sclerosing cholangitis and polycythemia vera) may be affected by basophils. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Other 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 19 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Unspecified 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 22 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,980,413
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Dermatology
#1,509
of 2,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,779
of 330,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Dermatology
#43
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,227 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.