| Title |
Sulfur/nickel ferrite composite as cathode with high-volumetric-capacity for lithium-sulfur battery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science China Materials, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40843-018-9292-7 |
| Authors |
Ze Zhang, Di-Hua Wu, Zhen Zhou, Guo-Ran Li, Sheng Liu, Xue-Ping Gao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 5 | 29% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 29% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,087,071
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Science China Materials
#8
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,896
of 330,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Materials
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.