You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
史料からみた桜島火山安永噴火の推移
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, October 1998
|
| DOI | 10.18940/kazan.43.5_373 |
| Authors |
井村 隆介 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 9 | 26% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 91% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,412,562
of 25,608,265 outputs
Outputs from BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#1
of 205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#579
of 32,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,608,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them