| Title |
Why the Greenwich meridian moved
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Geodesy, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00190-015-0844-y |
| Authors |
Stephen Malys, John H. Seago, Nikolaos K. Pavlis, P. Kenneth Seidelmann, George H. Kaplan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 13% |
| Japan | 13 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 6% |
| Germany | 5 | 5% |
| France | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| Turkey | 2 | 2% |
| Austria | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 42 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 73 | 70% |
| Scientists | 27 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 21% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 31% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 15% |
| Engineering | 7 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 324. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#105,411
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geodesy
#1
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,034
of 277,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geodesy
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them