| Title |
The availability of life-cycle assessment, water footprinting, and carbon footprinting studies in Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11367-018-1484-2 |
| Authors |
Michael O. Bodunrin, Nicholas W. Burman, Joel Croft, Shaun Engelbrecht, Taahira Goga, A. O. Ladenika, O. S. MacGregor, Mpho Maepa, Kevin G. Harding |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 3 | 60% |
| Finland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 16 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Energy | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,112,042
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#96
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,969
of 331,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.