↓ Skip to main content

Commentary: Moving towards policy coherence in trade and health

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Public Health Policy, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Commentary: Moving towards policy coherence in trade and health
Published in
Journal of Public Health Policy, August 2015
DOI 10.1057/jphp.2015.23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen Walls, Phillip Baker, Richard Smith

Abstract

International trade has brought economic benefits to many countries, but the association of trade and investment liberalisation with poor health outcomes concerns the public health community. The need to secure more 'healthy' trade is a recognised priority, especially as countries move from global to regional/bilateral trade agreements - with greater public health risks. However, a transition towards 'healthier trade' may be hindered by worldview differences between the trade and health communities. There is a tendency for health actors to perceive trade as a threat to population health, and for trade actors to view health as a constraint to trade objectives of reducing barriers to cross-border commercial flows and economic growth. Unless such differing worldviews can be aligned, finding ways forward for addressing public health in trade policy is likely to be difficult. Moving forward will involve understanding the values and drivers of the respective groups, and developing solutions palatable to their various interests. Given the power imbalances between the two areas, it is likely that the health community will have to make the first moves in this respect. This article outlines the key issues involved and suggests areas where such moves have been, and may be made.Journal of Public Health Policy advance online publication, 6 August 2015; doi:10.1057/jphp.2015.23.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Other 8 25%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,218,337
of 25,019,915 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Health Policy
#343
of 847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,835
of 269,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Health Policy
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,019,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.