↓ Skip to main content

Asymmetries in the revenue–expenditure nexus: new evidence from South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Economics, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Asymmetries in the revenue–expenditure nexus: new evidence from South Africa
Published in
Empirical Economics, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00181-017-1397-0
Authors

A. Phiri

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 19%
Chemical Engineering 2 13%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2018.
All research outputs
#4,240,790
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Economics
#93
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,279
of 441,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Economics
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.