↓ Skip to main content

Symbolic violence and disempowerment as factors in the adverse impact of immigration detention on adult asylum seekers’ mental health

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Public Health, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Symbolic violence and disempowerment as factors in the adverse impact of immigration detention on adult asylum seekers’ mental health
Published in
International Journal of Public Health, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00038-018-1121-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet Cleveland, Rachel Kronick, Hanna Gros, Cécile Rousseau

Abstract

The first objective of this qualitative component of a mixed-methods study is to provide a descriptive account of adult asylum seekers' experience of detention in Canadian immigration detention centers. The second objective is to identify the main underlying factors accounting for their reported feelings of distress. Researchers interviewed 81 adult asylum seekers held in two Canadian immigration detention centers concerning their experience of detention. Participants were drawn from a sample of 122 detained asylum seekers who had completed structured questionnaires about mental health and detention conditions. Asylum seekers expressed shock and humiliation at being "treated like criminals." Detainees felt disempowered by the experience of waiting for an indeterminate period for the outcome of a discretionary decision over which they have little control, but which will determine their freedom and their future. For trauma survivors, detention sometimes triggered retraumatization. Detention, even for brief periods in relatively adequate conditions, was found to be detrimental to asylum seekers' mental health. This adverse impact appears to be largely attributable to the combined effect of two factors: symbolic violence and disempowerment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 33 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 22%
Social Sciences 14 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 35 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,148,608
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#234
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,913
of 342,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#6
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.