You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Difference in Beliefs about Lie Clues Related to Werewolf-Game Experience: Comparison among Undergraduates, Werewolf-Game Fans, and Werewolf-Game Stage Actors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Personality, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2132/personality.24.88 |
| Authors |
Hiroaki Tanno, Takeshi Kodama |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 9 | 28% |
| Unknown | 23 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,494,902
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Personality
#7
of 288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,690
of 359,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Personality
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.