↓ Skip to main content

Brief Report: Patterns of Eye Movements in Face to Face Conversation are Associated with Autistic Traits: Evidence from a Student Sample

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
Title
Brief Report: Patterns of Eye Movements in Face to Face Conversation are Associated with Autistic Traits: Evidence from a Student Sample
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10803-015-2546-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrius Vabalas, Megan Freeth

Abstract

The current study investigated whether the amount of autistic traits shown by an individual is associated with viewing behaviour during a face-to-face interaction. The eye movements of 36 neurotypical university students were recorded using a mobile eye-tracking device. High amounts of autistic traits were neither associated with reduced looking to the social partner overall, nor with reduced looking to the face. However, individuals who were high in autistic traits exhibited reduced visual exploration during the face-to-face interaction overall, as demonstrated by shorter and less frequent saccades. Visual exploration was not related to social anxiety. This study suggests that there are systematic individual differences in visual exploration during social interactions and these are related to amount of autistic traits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 156 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 21%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 44 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 58 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Computer Science 7 4%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 52 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,518,394
of 25,199,243 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,091
of 5,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,360
of 270,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#24
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,199,243 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.