↓ Skip to main content

The insulin-like growth factor system and colorectal cancer: clinical and experimental evidence

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Colorectal Disease, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
The insulin-like growth factor system and colorectal cancer: clinical and experimental evidence
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease, June 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00384-005-0776-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Davies, S. Gupta, G. Goldspink, M. Winslet

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2015.
All research outputs
#18,422,065
of 22,821,814 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#1,286
of 1,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,292
of 46,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,821,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,831 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.