↓ Skip to main content

Dutch norms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) – parent form for children aged 2–18 years

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Dutch norms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) – parent form for children aged 2–18 years
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12955-018-0948-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Maurice-Stam, L. Haverman, A. Splinter, H. A. van Oers, S. A. Schepers, M. A. Grootenhuis

Abstract

Identification of children at risk for psychosocial problems is important to be able to provide supportive and tailored care at an early stage. Due to its brevity and wide age range, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Parent Form is an appropriate instrument for use in paediatric clinical practice as it facilitates assessment of psychosocial functioning from young childhood into adulthood. The aim of the present study was to provide Dutch normative data for the SDQ Parent Form. A sample of 1947 parents with children aged 2-18 years was drawn from a large panel of a Dutch research agency, stratified on Dutch key demographics of the parents. The SDQ Parent Form assesses the child's Emotional symptoms, Conduct problems, Hyperactivity-Inattention, Peer problems and Prosocial behaviour. Summary scores can be calculated: Internalising, Externalising and Total difficulties. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient) and normative scores (mean, median, clinical cut-off scores) of the SDQ- Parent Form were calculated in four age-groups 2-3, 4-5, 6-11 and 12-18 years. Gender differences were tested with independent t-tests. A total of 1174 parents (60.3%) completed the SDQ. In the age-groups 2-3 and 4-5, norm scores are not available for Conduct problems and Peer problems due to insufficient internal consistency. In addition, in age-group 2-3, norm scores for Emotional symptoms and Internalising are not available because of insufficient internal consistency. In the age-groups 6-11 and 12-18, norm scores are available for all scales, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients 0.53-0.86. The comparison by gender revealed that boys had more behavioural problems than girls (0.000 < p < 0.048), most prevalent for Hyperactivity-Inattention, Peer Problems, Prosocial behaviour, Externalising and Total Difficulties. Dutch normative data by age-group and gender are now available for parent-reported SDQ scores in children aged 2-18 years. Due to insufficient internal consistency, normative scores for 2-5 year-old children could not be presented for several SDQ scales. Yet, the SDQ Total score provides a reliable indication of the psychosocial functioning of younger children. In case of high Total scores in children younger than 6 years, alternatively to scale scores, the answers on the individual items could yield useful clinical information about the child's problems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Student > Master 19 14%
Researcher 10 7%
Other 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 48 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 55 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,981,376
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#398
of 2,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,036
of 328,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#33
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.