| Title |
The practice and principles of community-based wildlife management in Zimbabwe: the CAMPFIRE programme
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, March 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00051780 |
| Authors |
Brian Child |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Zimbabwe | 2 | 29% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 20% |
| Researcher | 31 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 51 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 17% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,832,719
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#416
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,494
of 27,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.