Title |
Evaluation of genetic resources in the genus Asparagus for resistance to Asparagus virus 1 (AV-1)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10722-016-0476-y |
Authors |
Thomas Nothnagel, Holger Budahn, Ilona Krämer, Edgar Schliephake, Edit Lantos, Susann Plath, Reiner Krämer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 44% |
Professor | 1 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
Researcher | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 56% |
Engineering | 2 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,064,088
of 23,347,114 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#32
of 727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,341
of 421,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,347,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.