You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Moderate Alcohol Consumption During Adult Life, Drinking Patterns, and Breast Cancer Risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2011.1590 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wendy Y. Chen, Bernard Rosner, Susan E. Hankinson, Graham A. Colditz, Walter C. Willett |
| Abstract |
Multiple studies have linked alcohol consumption to breast cancer risk, but the risk of lower levels of consumption has not been well quantified. In addition, the role of drinking patterns (ie, frequency of drinking and "binge" drinking) and consumption at different times of adult life are not well understood. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Honduras | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 67 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 78 | 93% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 6% |
| Scientists | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 495 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 476 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 85 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 74 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 13% |
| Researcher | 51 | 10% |
| Other | 36 | 7% |
| Other | 89 | 18% |
| Unknown | 97 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 147 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 53 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 6% |
| Psychology | 20 | 4% |
| Other | 75 | 15% |
| Unknown | 125 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 769. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2023.
All research outputs
#25,138
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#585
of 36,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65
of 153,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#3
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.