↓ Skip to main content

No detectable effects of lightweight geolocators on a Palaearctic-African long-distance migrant

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ornithology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
No detectable effects of lightweight geolocators on a Palaearctic-African long-distance migrant
Published in
Journal of Ornithology, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10336-015-1274-6
Authors

Rien E. van Wijk, Guillaume Souchay, Susanne Jenni-Eiermann, Silke Bauer, Michael Schaub

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 25%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Master 9 15%
Other 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 58%
Environmental Science 10 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2016.
All research outputs
#3,467,784
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#302
of 1,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,108
of 277,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#18
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.