↓ Skip to main content

Factors Influencing Quality of Life among People Living with HIV in Coastal South India

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC), August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors Influencing Quality of Life among People Living with HIV in Coastal South India
Published in
Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC), August 2015
DOI 10.1177/2325957415599213
Pubmed ID
Authors

Banagi Yathiraj Arjun, Bhaskaran Unnikrishnan, John T. Ramapuram, Rekha Thapar, Prasanna Mithra, Nithin Kumar, Deepak Madi, Vaman Kulkarni, Ramesh Holla, Bhagawan Darshan

Abstract

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has increased life expectancy of HIV/AIDS patients, but the quality of life (QOL) still remains the same. In this cross-sectional study, 356 people living with HIV (PLHIV) were interviewed to assess their QOL using WHOQOL-HIV BREF questionnaire. The association between QOL with sociodemographic, clinical and cohabitation status of the participants was tested using ANOVA and Student t-test, and p value < .05 was considered statistically significant. Physical domain of QOL showed maximum score of 16.4, while a minimum score of 12.2 was seen in social relationship domain. Participants with higher socioeconomic status (SES) and self-motivated to take ART had shown better scores across all the domains of QOL (p < .05). In our study, quality of life was high among males, younger patients, married participants, higher socioeconomic status, longer duration of ART, self-motivation to take ART, absence of opportunistic infection, and with higher CD4 count.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bhutan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 150 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Lecturer 9 6%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 59 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Unspecified 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 67 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC)
#594
of 667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,716
of 275,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC)
#20
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 667 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.