↓ Skip to main content

Delays in Initiating Post-operative Prophylactic Biologic Therapy Are Common Among Crohn’s Disease Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Delays in Initiating Post-operative Prophylactic Biologic Therapy Are Common Among Crohn’s Disease Patients
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10620-018-5159-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shirley Cohen-Mekelburg, Stephanie Gold, Yecheskel Schneider, Madison Dennis, Clara Oromendia, Heather Yeo, Fabrizio Michelassi, Ellen Scherl, Adam Steinlauf

Abstract

Studies have shown that prophylactic biologic therapy can reduce post-surgical Crohn's disease recurrence. We aimed to identify the frequency of delay and risk factors associated with a delay in the initiation of prophylactic post-surgical biologic therapy in high-risk patients. We performed a cohort study of Crohn's disease patients who underwent a bowel resection. We identified those at risk of recurrence and explored multiple characteristics for those with and without a delay post-operatively. A total of 84 patients were included in our analysis of which 69.0% had a greater than 4-week delay and 56.0% a greater than 8-week delay in post-surgical biologic prophylaxis. Publicly insured patients had a 100% delay in post-surgical prophylaxis initiation (p = 0.039, p = 0.003 at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively). Patients on a biologic pre-surgery were less likely to have a delay (p < 0.001) in post-operative prophylaxis. Care at an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center was associated with timely therapy when considering a post-operative immunomodulator or biologic strategy. There are a substantial number of delays in initiating post-operative prophylactic biologic therapy in high-risk patients. Identifying susceptible patients by insurance type or absence of pre-operative therapy can focus future improvement efforts. Additionally, consultation with IBD-specialized providers should be considered in peri-surgical IBD care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Other 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 11 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2018.
All research outputs
#14,496,973
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#2,610
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,677
of 332,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#30
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.