↓ Skip to main content

A clinical prediction rule for identifying patients with patellofemoral pain who are likely to benefit from foot orthoses: a preliminary determination

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Sports Medicine, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A clinical prediction rule for identifying patients with patellofemoral pain who are likely to benefit from foot orthoses: a preliminary determination
Published in
British Journal of Sports Medicine, September 2008
DOI 10.1136/bjsm.2008.052613
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bill Vicenzino, Natalie Collins, Joshua Cleland, Thomas McPoil

Abstract

To develop a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP) who are more likely to benefit from foot orthoses. Posthoc analysis of one treatment arm of a randomised clinical trial. Single-centre trial in a community setting in Brisbane, Australia. 42 participants (mean age 27.9 years) with a clinical diagnosis of PFP (median duration 36 months). Foot orthoses fitted by a physiotherapist. Five-point global improvement scale at 12-week follow-up, dichotomised with marked improvement equalling success. Potential predictor variables identified by univariate analyses were age, height, pain severity, anterior knee pain scale score, functional index questionnaire score, foot morphometry (arch height ratio, mid-foot width difference from non-weight bearing to weight bearing) and overall orthoses comfort. Parsimonious fitting of these variables to a model that explained success with orthoses identified the following: age (>25 years), height (<165 cm), worst pain visual analogue scale (<53.25 mm) and a difference in mid-foot width from non-weight bearing to weight bearing (>10.96 mm). The pretest success rate of 40% increased to 86% if the patient exhibited three of these variables (positive likelihood ratio 8.8; 95% CI 1.2 to 66.9). Post-hoc analysis identified age, height, pain severity and mid-foot morphometry as possible predictors of successful treatment of PFP with foot orthoses, thereby providing practitioners with information for prescribing foot orthoses in PFP and stimulating further research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 214 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Researcher 23 10%
Other 19 8%
Other 53 23%
Unknown 42 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 17%
Sports and Recreations 17 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 54 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,374,015
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#4,207
of 6,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,288
of 99,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#22
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.