↓ Skip to main content

Effects of strategy on visual working memory capacity

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Effects of strategy on visual working memory capacity
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, July 2015
DOI 10.3758/s13423-015-0891-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesse J. Bengson, Steven J. Luck

Abstract

Substantial evidence suggests that individual differences in estimates of working memory capacity reflect differences in how effectively people use their intrinsic storage capacity. This suggests that estimated capacity could be increased by instructions that encourage more effective encoding strategies. The present study tested this by giving different participants explicit strategy instructions in a change detection task. Compared to a condition in which participants were simply told to do their best, we found that estimated capacity was increased for participants who were instructed to remember the entire visual display, even at set sizes beyond their capacity. However, no increase in estimated capacity was found for a group that was told to focus on a subset of the items in supracapacity arrays. This finding confirms the hypothesis that encoding strategies may influence visual working memory performance, and it is contrary to the hypothesis that the optimal strategy is to filter out any items beyond the storage capacity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 113 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 24%
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Master 22 19%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 50%
Neuroscience 20 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 28 24%