| Title |
Laptop versus longhand note taking: effects on lecture notes and achievement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Instructional Science, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11251-018-9458-0 |
| Authors |
Linlin Luo, Kenneth A. Kiewra, Abraham E. Flanigan, Markeya S. Peteranetz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 29% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 67% |
| Scientists | 6 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 265 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 3% |
| Researcher | 8 | 3% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 9% |
| Unknown | 169 | 64% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 33 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 177 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#944,374
of 25,646,963 outputs
Outputs from Instructional Science
#9
of 497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,253
of 342,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Instructional Science
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,646,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.