↓ Skip to main content

An Update on Methods for Revascularization and Expansion of the TASC Lesion Classification to Include Below-the-Knee Arteries

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Endovascular Therapy, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 959)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Update on Methods for Revascularization and Expansion of the TASC Lesion Classification to Include Below-the-Knee Arteries
Published in
Journal of Endovascular Therapy, August 2015
DOI 10.1177/1526602815592206
Pubmed ID
Authors

The TASC Steering Committee*, Michael R. Jaff, Christopher J. White, William R. Hiatt, Gerry R. Fowkes, John Dormandy, Mahmood Razavi, Jim Reekers, Lars Norgren

Abstract

The Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC) guidelines were last updated in 2007 (TASC II) and represented the collaboration of international vascular specialties involved in the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Since the publication of TASC II, there have been innovations in endovascular revascularization strategies for patients with PAD. The intent of this publication is to provide a complete anatomic lower limb TASC lesion classification, including the infrapopliteal segment, and an updated literature review of new endovascular techniques and practice patterns employed by vascular specialists today.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 14%
Other 16 13%
Student > Postgraduate 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Master 10 8%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 29 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 36 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2016.
All research outputs
#1,509,847
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Endovascular Therapy
#9
of 959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,997
of 275,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Endovascular Therapy
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 959 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.