↓ Skip to main content

Occupational noise exposure and hearing: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
286 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
723 Mendeley
Title
Occupational noise exposure and hearing: a systematic review
Published in
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00420-015-1083-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arve Lie, Marit Skogstad, Håkon A. Johannessen, Tore Tynes, Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum, Karl-Christian Nordby, Bo Engdahl, Kristian Tambs

Abstract

To give a systematic review of the development of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) in working life. A literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Health and Safety Abstracts, with appropriate keywords on noise in the workplace and health, revealed 22,413 articles which were screened by six researchers. A total of 698 articles were reviewed in full text and scored with a checklist, and 187 articles were found to be relevant and of sufficient quality for further analysis. Occupational noise exposure causes between 7 and 21 % of the hearing loss among workers, lowest in the industrialized countries, where the incidence is going down, and highest in the developing countries. It is difficult to distinguish between NIHL and age-related hearing loss at an individual level. Most of the hearing loss is age related. Men lose hearing more than women do. Heredity also plays a part. Socioeconomic position, ethnicity and other factors, such as smoking, high blood pressure, diabetes, vibration and chemical substances, may also affect hearing. The use of firearms may be harmful to hearing, whereas most other sources of leisure-time noise seem to be less important. Impulse noise seems to be more deleterious to hearing than continuous noise. Occupational groups at high risk of NIHL are the military, construction workers, agriculture and others with high noise exposure. The prevalence of NIHL is declining in most industrialized countries, probably due to preventive measures. Hearing loss is mainly related to increasing age.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 723 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 721 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 131 18%
Student > Bachelor 103 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 9%
Researcher 44 6%
Student > Postgraduate 40 6%
Other 114 16%
Unknown 229 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 152 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 73 10%
Engineering 58 8%
Environmental Science 45 6%
Social Sciences 25 3%
Other 110 15%
Unknown 260 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,383,614
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#111
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,697
of 278,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them