You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging detection of basal forebrain cholinergic degeneration in a mouse model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NeuroImage, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.075 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Georg M. Kerbler, Adam S. Hamlin, Kerstin Pannek, Nyoman D. Kurniawan, Marianne D. Keller, Stephen E. Rose, Elizabeth J. Coulson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 19% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 14% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#10,824
of 12,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,691
of 201,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#103
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.