↓ Skip to main content

Chiral Monomers Ensure Orientational Specificity of Monomer Binding During Polymer Self-Replication

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Chiral Monomers Ensure Orientational Specificity of Monomer Binding During Polymer Self-Replication
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00239-018-9845-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hemachander Subramanian, Robert A. Gatenby

Abstract

Biomolecular homochirality is universally observed in living systems but the molecular and evolutionary dynamics that led to its emergence are unknown. In fact, there are significant disadvantages in using chiral monomers for polymerization, which include enantiomeric cross-inhibition in racemic medium and under-utilization of available resources for self-replication in the primordial environment. Nevertheless, most investigations of homochirality in living systems assume that the individual primordial monomers were chiral prior to the formation of self-replicating polymer and therefore focus on identifying a symmetry-breaking mechanism that might choose one enantiomer over the other in a racemic medium. Within the premise that the extant biomolecules are products of molecular evolution, we ask a related but distinct question: why is an achiral monomer molecule disfavored? Here we identify an evolutionary advantage for molecular evolution to choose chiral over achiral monomers to construct primordial self-replicating polymers. We argue that when polymerization is constrained to proceed in only one direction along the template, as in DNA, evolution favors chiral monomers and homochiral polymers. This evolutionary advantage stems from the ability of a chiral monomer to bond with the template in only one orientation relative to the template monomer, along the direction of polymerization. An achiral monomer, on the other hand, offers more than one possible orientation for bonding with the template monomer, due to the presence of symmetry elements in its structure, which would lead to inhibition of polymerization. We show that the requirement of orientational specificity leads to monomer chirality, by using a known relationship between rotational and reflection symmetry elements, within the constraint that the resultant polymers are helical.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 2 33%
Researcher 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 33%
Chemistry 2 33%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,240,466
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#430
of 1,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,840
of 325,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.