↓ Skip to main content

Identification of IDUA and WNT16 Phosphorylation‐Related Non‐Synonymous Polymorphisms for Bone Mineral Density in Meta‐Analyses of Genome‐Wide Association Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bone & Mineral Research, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of IDUA and WNT16 Phosphorylation‐Related Non‐Synonymous Polymorphisms for Bone Mineral Density in Meta‐Analyses of Genome‐Wide Association Studies
Published in
Journal of Bone & Mineral Research, August 2015
DOI 10.1002/jbmr.2687
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tianhua Niu, Ning Liu, Xun Yu, Ming Zhao, Hyung Jin Choi, Paul J Leo, Matthew A Brown, Lei Zhang, Yu‐Fang Pei, Hui Shen, Hao He, Xiaoying Fu, Shan Lu, Xiang‐Ding Chen, Li‐Jun Tan, Tie‐Lin Yang, Yan Guo, Nam H Cho, Jie Shen, Yan‐Fang Guo, Geoffrey C Nicholson, Richard L Prince, John A Eisman, Graeme Jones, Philip N Sambrook, Qing Tian, Xue‐Zhen Zhu, Christopher J Papasian, Emma L Duncan, André G Uitterlinden, Chan Soo Shin, Shuanglin Xiang, Hong‐Wen Deng

Abstract

Protein phosphorylation regulates a wide variety of cellular processes. Thus, we hypothesize that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that may modulate protein phosphorylation could affect osteoporosis risk. Based on a previous conventional genome-wide association (GWA) study, we conducted a three-stage meta-analysis targeting phosphorylation-related SNPs (phosSNPs) for femoral neck (FN)-, total hip (HIP)-, and Lumbar Spine (LS)-BMD phenotypes. In stage 1, 9,593 phosSNPs were meta-analyzed in 11,140 individuals of various ancestries. Genome-wide significance (GWS) and suggestive significance were defined by α = 5.21 × 10(-6) (0.05/9,593) and 1.00 × 10(-4) , respectively. In stage 2, 9 stage 1-discovered phosSNPs (based on α = 1.00 × 10(-4) ) were in silico meta-analyzed in Dutch, Korean, and Australian cohorts. In stage 3, four phosSNPs that replicated in stage 2 (based on α = 5.56 × 10(-3) , 0.05/9) were de novo genotyped in two independent cohorts. IDUA rs3755955 and rs6831280, and WNT16 rs2707466 were associated with BMD phenotypes in each respective stage, and in 3 stages combined, achieving GWS for both FN-BMD (P-value = 8.36 × 10(-10) , 5.26 × 10(-10) , and 3.01 × 10(-10) , respectively) and HIP-BMD (P-value = 3.26 × 10(-6) , 1.97 × 10(-6) , and 1.63 × 10(-12) , respectively). Although in vitro studies demonstrated no differences in expressions of wild-type and mutant forms of IDUA and WNT16B proteins, in silico analysis predicts that WNT16 rs2707466 directly abolishes a phosphorylation site, which could cause a deleterious effect on WNT16 protein, and that IDUA phosSNPs rs3755955 and rs6831280 could exert indirect effects on nearby phosphorylation sites. Further studies will be required to determine the detailed and specific molecular effects of these BMD-associated non-synonymous variants. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 7 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2015.
All research outputs
#21,064,103
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bone & Mineral Research
#4,459
of 4,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,444
of 276,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bone & Mineral Research
#47
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.