↓ Skip to main content

Quantification of β-Amyloidosis and rCBF with Dedicated PET, 7 T MR Imaging, and High-Resolution Microscopic MR Imaging at 16.4 T in APP23 Mice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nuclear Medicine, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantification of β-Amyloidosis and rCBF with Dedicated PET, 7 T MR Imaging, and High-Resolution Microscopic MR Imaging at 16.4 T in APP23 Mice
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Medicine, August 2015
DOI 10.2967/jnumed.115.159350
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florian C. Maier, Marianne D. Keller, Daniel Bukala, Benjamin Bender, Julia G. Mannheim, Ian M. Brereton, Graham J. Galloway, Bernd J. Pichler

Abstract

Non-invasive quantification of the amyloid-load is of paramount interest in the field of Alzheimerŕs disease research. We present a combined PET/7 T-MRI and 16.4 T-microscopic-MRI (µMRI) dual-modality imaging approach enabling the quantification of the amyloid-load at high-sensitivity and high-resolution, and of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in the brain of transgenic APP23 mice. Moreover, we demonstrate a novel, voxel-based correlative data analysis method which we used for in-depth evaluation of amyloid-PET and rCBF-data. We injected [(11)C]PIB intravenously in transgenic (tg) and control (co) APP23 mice and performed dynamic PET measurements. rCBF-data were recorded with a flow sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) approach at 7 T. Subsequently, animals were sacrificed and brains harvested for ex vivo µMRI at 16.4 T with a T2*-weighted gradient-echo sequence at 30 µm spatial resolution. Additionally, correlative amyloid histology was performed. The [(11)C]PIB-PET data were quantified to non-displaceable binding potentials (BPnd) using the Logan graphical analysis; FAIR-data were quantified with a simplified version of the Bloch equation. Amyloid-load assessed by both, [(11)C]PIB-PET and amyloid histology (AβH) was highest in the frontal cortex of tg mice ([(11)C]PIB-BPnd: 0.93±0.08, AβH: 15.1±1.5%), followed by the temporoparietal cortex ([(11)C]PIB-BPnd: 0.75±0.08, AβH: 13.9±0.7%) and the hippocampus ([(11)C]PIB-BPnd: 0.71±0.09, AβH: 9.2±0.9%), and was lowest in the thalamus ([(11)C]PIB-BPnd: 0.40±0.07, AβH: 6.6±0.6%). However, [(11)C]PIB-BPnd and AβH linearly correlated (R(2)=0.82, p<0.05) and were significantly higher in tg animals (p<0.01). Similarly, µMRI allowed quantifying the amyloid-load, in addition the detection of substructures within single amyloid plaques correlating with amyloid deposition density and the measurement of hippocampal atrophy. Finally, we detected an inverse relationship between [(11)C]PIB-BPnd and rCBF-MRI in the voxel-based analysis that was absent in control mice (slopetg: -0.11±0.03; slopeco: 0.004±0.005, P = 0.014). Our dual-modality imaging approach employing [(11)C]PIB-PET/7 T-MRI and 16.4 T-µMRI allowed amyloid-load quantification with high-sensitivity and high-resolution, the identification of substructures within single amyloid plaques, and the quantification of rCBF. Future applications of this multiparametrical imaging and data-analysis approach could simplify the identification of treatment impact on amyloid-load status and brain physiology and aid the development of new treatment strategies, enabling both a morphological and functional classification of underlying mechanisms-of-action.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 24%
Student > Master 4 16%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 28%
Neuroscience 4 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2016.
All research outputs
#2,879,159
of 22,821,814 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
#600
of 4,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,651
of 264,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
#7
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,821,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.