↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility of analysis of the SCN5A gene in paraffin embedded samples in sudden infant death cases at the Pretoria Medico-Legal Laboratory, South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Feasibility of analysis of the SCN5A gene in paraffin embedded samples in sudden infant death cases at the Pretoria Medico-Legal Laboratory, South Africa
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12024-018-9995-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara Ströh van Deventer, Lorraine du Toit-Prinsloo, Chantal van Niekerk

Abstract

To determine variations in the SCN5A gene linked to inherited cardiac arrhythmogenic disorders in sudden, unexplained infant death (SUID) cases examined at the Pretoria Medico-Legal Laboratory, South Africa. A retrospective study was conducted on SUID cases and controls, analyzing DNA extracted from archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) myocardial tissue samples as well as blood samples. A total of 48 FFPE tissue samples (cases), 10 control FFPE tissue samples and nine control blood samples were included. DNA extracted from all samples was used to test for variations in the SCN5A gene by using high resolution melt (HRM) real-time PCR and sequencing. Genetic analysis showed 31 different single nucleotide variants in the entire study population (n = 67). Five previously reported variants of known pathogenic significance, and 14 variants of benign clinical significance, were identified. The study found 12 different variants in the cases that were not published in any database or literature and were considered novel. Of these novel variants, two were predicted as "probably damaging" with a high level of certainty (found in four case samples), one (identified in another case sample) was predicted to be "possibly damaging" with a 50% chance of being disease-causing, and nine were predicted to be benign. This study shows the significant added value of using genetic testing in determining the cause of death in South African SUID cases. Considering the high heritability of these arrhythmic disorders, post mortem genetic testing could play an important role in the understanding of the pathogenesis thereof and could also aid in the diagnosis and treatment of family members at risk, ultimately preventing similar future cases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Sports and Recreations 1 10%
Materials Science 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2018.
All research outputs
#16,454,538
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#407
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,963
of 305,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.