↓ Skip to main content

Perception of unfairness and intergroup support provision: The role of guilt feelings and attribution of responsibility

Overview of attention for article published in THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perception of unfairness and intergroup support provision: The role of guilt feelings and attribution of responsibility
Published in
THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, January 2006
DOI 10.2130/jjesp.45.158
Authors

Kaori Karasawa, Nobuhiro Mitani

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
#133
of 366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,215
of 174,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 366 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.