↓ Skip to main content

Does muscle biopsy change the treatment of pediatric muscular disease?

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Surgery International, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Does muscle biopsy change the treatment of pediatric muscular disease?
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00383-018-4285-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph A. Sujka, Nhatrang Le, Justin Sobrino, Leo A. Benedict, Rebecca Rentea, Hanna Alemayehu, Shawn D. St. Peter

Abstract

Muscle biopsy is performed to confirm the diagnosis of neuromuscular disease and guide therapy. The purpose of our study was to determine if muscle biopsy changed patient diagnosis or treatment, which patients were most likely to benefit from muscle biopsy, and complications resulting from muscle biopsy. An IRB-approved retrospective chart review of all patients less than 18 years old undergoing muscle biopsy between January 2010 and August 2016 was performed. Demographics, patient presentation, diagnosis, treatment, hospital course, and follow-up were evaluated. Descriptive and comparative (student's t test, Mann-Whitney U, and Fisher's exact test) statistical analysis was performed. Medians were reported with interquartile range (IQR). 90 patients underwent a muscle biopsy. The median age at biopsy was 5 years (2, 10). 37% (n = 34) had a definitive diagnosis. 39% (n = 35) had a change in their diagnosis. 37% (n = 34) had a change in their treatment course. In the 34 patients who had a change in their treatment, the most common diagnosis was inflammatory disease at 44% (n = 15). In the 56 patients who did not have a change in treatment, the most common diagnosis was hypotonia at 30% (n = 17). There was no difference in patients who had a change in treatment based on pathology versus those that did not. The median length of follow-up was 3 years (1, 5). Muscle biopsy should be considered to diagnose patients with symptoms consistent with inflammatory or dystrophic muscular disease. The likelihood of this altering the patient's treatment course is around 40%.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2018.
All research outputs
#20,522,137
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Surgery International
#956
of 1,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,611
of 331,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Surgery International
#17
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,273 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.