↓ Skip to main content

Parenting and Late Adolescent Emotional Adjustment: Mediating Effects of Discipline and Gender

Overview of attention for article published in Child Psychiatry & Human Development, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Parenting and Late Adolescent Emotional Adjustment: Mediating Effects of Discipline and Gender
Published in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10578-011-0229-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cliff McKinney, Mary Catherine Milone, Kimberly Renk

Abstract

Research suggests that parenting styles are related to the types of discipline parents utilize and that the coupling of parenting styles and discipline techniques are related to child outcomes. Although extant research examines the effects of parenting styles and discipline on child and early adolescent adjustment, less is known about adjustment in late adolescents, also described as emerging adults. Thus, the current study investigated the relationships among parenting styles (e.g., authoritative, authoritarian, permissive), discipline strategies (e.g., non-violent discipline, psychological aggression, physical assault), and emerging adult emotional adjustment (e.g., self-esteem, depression, and anxiety). The sample consisted of 526 participants ranging in age from 18 to 22 years. Results were analyzed with structural equation modeling and suggest that, although perceived parenting styles and discipline are both correlated with emerging adult emotional adjustment, perceived parenting is associated with emerging adult emotional adjustment for females but not males when examined simultaneously with perceived discipline. This finding demonstrates the importance of examining the direct and indirect relationships in the context of gender dyads.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 133 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 71 52%
Social Sciences 19 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 28 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2011.
All research outputs
#13,658,669
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#486
of 901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,910
of 108,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.