↓ Skip to main content

イトグモ(Loxosceles rufescens)によるイトグモ咬症(loxoscelism)の1例

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 255)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
イトグモ(Loxosceles rufescens)によるイトグモ咬症(loxoscelism)の1例
Published in
Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology, May 2017
DOI 10.14924/dermatol.127.1339
Authors

森戸 浩明

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,744,706
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#34
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,967
of 325,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them