Title |
In Defense of Eating Meat
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10806-015-9534-2 |
Authors |
Timothy Hsiao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
Australia | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 31% |
Student > Master | 13 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
Professor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 16 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Philosophy | 11 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 13% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 20% |
Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#5,081,803
of 24,078,959 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
#114
of 406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,928
of 262,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,078,959 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.