| Title |
Evidence of long-distance dispersal of a gray wolf from the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10344-018-1201-2 |
| Authors |
Michael E. Byrne, Sarah C. Webster, Stacey L. Lance, Cara N. Love, Thomas G. Hinton, Dmitry Shamovich, James C. Beasley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 18% |
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| Chile | 2 | 5% |
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 70% |
| Scientists | 8 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 376. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2021.
All research outputs
#82,047
of 25,240,298 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#3
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,879
of 335,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,240,298 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.