↓ Skip to main content

Paternalism and the doctor-patient relationship in general practice.

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, August 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Paternalism and the doctor-patient relationship in general practice.
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, August 1992
Pubmed ID
Authors

B McKinstry

Abstract

This paper is a brief introduction to the subject of paternalism as it occurs in general practice. A definition of paternalism is provided and the four main types of doctor-patient relationship within the paternalistic spectrum are described. These relationships are illustrated with examples from general practice. Some of the extensive literature on paternalism is reviewed. It is concluded that paternalism is rarely justified when treating patients of sound mind and then only where restoration of the patients' autonomy is the main aim.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 136 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 32%
Student > Master 24 17%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 9 6%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 16 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 47%
Psychology 16 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 24 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,962,193
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,682
of 4,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,138
of 17,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them