↓ Skip to main content

A hypothesis for the evolution of androdioecy: the joint influence of reproductive assurance and local mate competition in a metapopulation

Overview of attention for article published in Evolutionary Ecology, May 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
A hypothesis for the evolution of androdioecy: the joint influence of reproductive assurance and local mate competition in a metapopulation
Published in
Evolutionary Ecology, May 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1011082827809
Authors

John R. Pannell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 6%
Switzerland 1 1%
France 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Costa Rica 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Serbia 1 1%
Unknown 75 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Professor 5 6%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 70%
Environmental Science 11 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,533,912
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Ecology
#294
of 710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,815
of 39,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Ecology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them