↓ Skip to main content

Gaze following in multiagent contexts: Evidence for a quorum-like principle

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Gaze following in multiagent contexts: Evidence for a quorum-like principle
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, June 2018
DOI 10.3758/s13423-018-1464-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Capozzi, Andrew P. Bayliss, Jelena Ristic

Abstract

Research shows that humans spontaneously follow another individual's gaze. However, little remains known on how they respond when multiple gaze cues diverge across members of a social group. To address this question, we presented participants with displays depicting three (Experiment 1) or five (Experiment 2) agents showing diverging social cues. In a three-person group, one individual looking at the target (33% of the group) was sufficient to elicit gaze-facilitated target responses. With a five-person group, however, three individuals looking at the target (60% of the group) were necessary to produce the same effect. Gaze following in small groups therefore appears to be based on a quorum-like principle, whereby the critical level of social information needed for gaze following is determined by a proportion of consistent social cues scaled as a function of group size. As group size grows, greater agreement is needed to evoke joint attention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Student > Master 6 16%
Unspecified 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 47%
Unspecified 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 29%