↓ Skip to main content

The role of leucine and its metabolites in protein and energy metabolism

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
19 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
211 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
Title
The role of leucine and its metabolites in protein and energy metabolism
Published in
Amino Acids, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00726-015-2067-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yehui Duan, Fengna Li, Yinghui Li, Yulong Tang, Xiangfeng Kong, Zemeng Feng, Tracy G. Anthony, Malcolm Watford, Yongqing Hou, Guoyao Wu, Yulong Yin

Abstract

Leucine (Leu) is a nutritionally essential branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) in animal nutrition. It is usually one of the most abundant amino acids in high-quality protein foods. Leu increases protein synthesis through activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway in skeletal muscle, adipose tissue and placental cells. Leu promotes energy metabolism (glucose uptake, mitochondrial biogenesis, and fatty acid oxidation) to provide energy for protein synthesis, while inhibiting protein degradation. Approximately 80 % of Leu is normally used for protein synthesis, while the remainder is converted to α-ketoisocaproate (α-KIC) and β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB) in skeletal muscle. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that some of the functions of Leu are modulated by its metabolites. Both α-KIC and HMB have recently received considerable attention as nutritional supplements used to increase protein synthesis, inhibit protein degradation, and regulate energy homeostasis in a variety of in vitro and in vivo models. Leu and its metabolites hold great promise to enhance the growth and health of animals (including humans, birds and fish).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 341 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 16%
Student > Master 53 15%
Student > Bachelor 45 13%
Researcher 28 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 54 16%
Unknown 91 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 61 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 5%
Sports and Recreations 16 5%
Other 44 13%
Unknown 105 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,187,795
of 24,092,222 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#59
of 1,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,804
of 268,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,092,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.