↓ Skip to main content

A geometric inequality and the complexity of computing volume

Overview of attention for article published in Discrete & Computational Geometry, December 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
A geometric inequality and the complexity of computing volume
Published in
Discrete & Computational Geometry, December 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf02187701
Authors

G. Elekes

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 30%
Researcher 11 26%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 19%
Computer Science 7 16%
Engineering 6 14%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Mathematics 3 7%
Other 12 28%
Unknown 3 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,410,276
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Discrete & Computational Geometry
#111
of 480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,589
of 44,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discrete & Computational Geometry
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 480 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them