↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Association between household food insecurity and annual health care costs

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
48 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
181 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
235 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
431 Mendeley
Title
Association between household food insecurity and annual health care costs
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, August 2015
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.150234
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valerie Tarasuk, Joyce Cheng, Claire de Oliveira, Naomi Dachner, Craig Gundersen, Paul Kurdyak

Abstract

Household food insecurity, a measure of income-related problems of food access, is growing in Canada and is tightly linked to poorer health status. We examined the association between household food insecurity status and annual health care costs. We obtained data for 67 033 people aged 18-64 years in Ontario who participated in the Canadian Community Health Survey in 2005, 2007/08 or 2009/10 to assess their household food insecurity status in the 12 months before the survey interview. We linked these data with administrative health care data to determine individuals' direct health care costs during the same 12-month period. Total health care costs and mean costs for inpatient hospital care, emergency department visits, physician services, same-day surgeries, home care services and prescription drugs covered by the Ontario Drug Benefit Program rose systematically with increasing severity of household food insecurity. Compared with total annual health care costs in food-secure households, adjusted annual costs were 16% ($235) higher in households with marginal food insecurity (95% confidence interval [CI] 10%-23% [$141-$334]), 32% ($455) higher in households with moderate food insecurity (95% CI 25%-39% [$361-$553]) and 76%($1092) higher in households with severe food insecurity (95% CI 65%-88% [$934-$1260]). When costs of prescription drugs covered by the Ontario Drug Benefit Program were included, the adjusted annual costs were 23% higher in households with marginal food insecurity (95% CI 16%-31%), 49% higher in those with moderate food insecurity (95% CI 41%-57%) and 121% higher in those with severe food insecurity (95% CI 107%-136%). Household food insecurity was a robust predictor of health care utilization and costs incurred by working-age adults,independent of other social determinants of health. Policy interventions at the provincial or federal level designed to reduce household food insecurity could offset considerable public expenditures in health care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 181 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 431 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 430 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 17%
Student > Bachelor 59 14%
Researcher 48 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 11%
Student > Postgraduate 22 5%
Other 84 19%
Unknown 100 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 71 16%
Social Sciences 71 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 68 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17 4%
Other 56 13%
Unknown 119 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 530. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#46,929
of 25,403,829 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#85
of 9,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#397
of 275,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#3
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,403,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.