You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Widespread non-additive and interaction effects within HLA loci modulate the risk of autoimmune diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ng.3379 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tobias L Lenz, Aaron J Deutsch, Buhm Han, Xinli Hu, Yukinori Okada, Stephen Eyre, Michael Knapp, Alexandra Zhernakova, Tom W J Huizinga, Gonçalo Abecasis, Jessica Becker, Guy E Boeckxstaens, Wei-Min Chen, Andre Franke, Dafna D Gladman, Ines Gockel, Javier Gutierrez-Achury, Javier Martin, Rajan P Nair, Markus M Nöthen, Suna Onengut-Gumuscu, Proton Rahman, Solbritt Rantapää-Dahlqvist, Philip E Stuart, Lam C Tsoi, David A van Heel, Jane Worthington, Mira M Wouters, Lars Klareskog, James T Elder, Peter K Gregersen, Johannes Schumacher, Stephen S Rich, Cisca Wijmenga, Shamil R Sunyaev, Paul I W de Bakker, Soumya Raychaudhuri |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 14% |
| Germany | 3 | 6% |
| Sweden | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 27 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 23 | 46% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 242 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 56 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 8% |
| Professor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 50 | 20% |
| Unknown | 39 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 62 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 49 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,141,100
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#1,878
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,339
of 277,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#34
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.