You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lava lake level as a gauge of magma reservoir pressure and eruptive hazard
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geology, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1130/g36896.1 |
| Authors |
Matthew R. Patrick, Kyle R. Anderson, Michael P. Poland, Tim R. Orr, Donald A. Swanson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 57 | 76% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2015.
All research outputs
#1,325,942
of 22,821,814 outputs
Outputs from Geology
#1,026
of 4,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,526
of 264,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geology
#51
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,821,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.